Add, follow, link,
watch or stalk us
VI VI
 
Author: on Saturday 27th October 2012

What Skyfall means for your weekend (and what text analytics means for marketing).

In the UK, it's now almost midnight on the day that Skyfall launched. I'm still working tonight, looking at social media and text analytics packages. But tomorrow night, should I go and see it? It's £60 - when I add the price of the tickets to the cost of the parking, the babysitter, and the tip I give the babysitter (for sitting in my chair, eating my snacks.)

I can’t wait ’til Monday to ask other people.

If the film’s a clunker [spoiler: it isn't], I don’t want to find out halfway through my big night out.

I could read the newspaper reviews but the reviewers are inevitably influenced by the studio’s marketing department hype, which is designed to generate a giant miasma of belief, weeks before anyone has actually seen the film.

Hold on, I’m looking at social media and text analytics packages, it’s been a good six hours since most people left work…

A quick call to Ubervu.com and they kindly gave me a data stream. Even late on a Friday night, it’s intuitive to set up. And I mean intuitive in the sense of “big pictures, simple concepts, I knew what to do instantly” (rather than the way some other social media software packages use ‘intuitive’, meaning “You’re on your own, we’re not gonna help you.”)

I used Ubervu to quickly find Tweets about Skyfall from people in the UK who’ve been to see it this evening.

The sentiment looks overwhelmingly positive. Ubervu’s Conversation Map gives me a quick insight into just how good people think it is:

verbal identity looks at text analytics of James Bond Skyfall

Ubervu's conversation Map for Skyfall, on UK day of launch

(I suppose if I was going to be pedantic about my assessment, I should more accurately say that the most commonly shared words about the film are overwhelmingly positive. But a skewing to this much positivity is unusual, in my experience.)

Time to work out why people liked it so much (and find out what people didn’t like). Time for some text analytics.

There are a handful of text analytics packages out there. Some run to $100,000 a seat.

I switched over to Semantria. As far as  I can work out, Semantria is for people who have more sense than money. The software is driven by the Lexalytics engine that sits at the heart of Radian6. It understands what is being talked about straightaway, without you having to spend time telling it about your specialist topic (Semantria has done that already. It swallowed Wikipedia. So now it knows that a butterfly is an insect, it’s a little like a moth, it’s nothing like a brick.)

There’s something else you should know about Semantria. The company is run by humans. Helpful humans. Even 5 pm on a Canadian Friday.

Semantria sits inside Excel . I open Excel, select the file from Ubervu, run Semantria. In less than 30 seconds, I’ve got the analysis of the 3000 Tweets.

Immediately, I can dig in and see why everyone seems to like Skyfall. Because text analytics is more than just a ‘keyword’ search engine, it can start building themes. The greatest positive sentiment is around the themes of ‘action’ and the ‘villain’. The greatest negative sentiment seems to be about Product Placement. If I want to check that other people’s idea of action is the same as mine, I can give Semantria a nudge and it will dive into the Tweets that are themed on ‘Action’ and will surface for me the sub-themes.

So now it’s almost 1am and I know that most people like Skyfall, but I also know they liked it for the reasons I’d like it. And there are a couple of reasons not to like it. But at least I’m forewarned now.

Finally, I know what Skyfall means for my weekend. What does it mean for marketing?

In my previous post, “What did Text Analytics Ever do for Marketing?” I made the point that text analytics is the missing piece for many CMO’s: it’s the quantitative part to the hunch. Text Analytics can give them an early warning of a product fault; it gives them the opportunity to adjust the marketing messages before the end of the marketing spend; it can give them a quantifiable insight into what consumers think of their pricing; it can let them turn up the positives (or dial down the negatives) in their marketing conversations.

My evening looking at the text analytics around social media mentions of Skyfall is a practical example of this.

If you were responsible for marketing Skyfall, what could you do now?

There’s already a ground swell of negative opinion about the product placement. So is it time for a carefully aimed press release about the positive role of the brands, and how Ian Fleming mentioned about one brand every page, in the original books?

The villian, Javier Bardem, is by most people’s judgement, outstanding. Is there anyway of seeding more conversations about him in the social media. Most people already liked him, most people will talk positively about him, which means more conversations will centre on the film’s positives.

If sales start lagging, [which honestly, given the feedback, seems unlikely] is there a way of picking up on other positive themes that people have talked about, and dialling them up in the paid-for communications?

The final thing – pricing. It seems such an outstanding film, I don’t think it’s time for anyone to start offering discounts or bribes quite yet.

After a long week, I think I deserve a treat. I’m booking my tickets right now. My £60 is spent.

Chris

 

Many many thanks to Ubervu and Semantria. And apologies for how I’ve skipped so much valuable info you provide. Please let’s blame it on the late night.

 

 

 

 

 

 
Author: on Saturday 27th October 2012 Tags: ,
 
COMMENTS 
28-10-2012 07:10Elisabeth at uberVU

Chris, I loved reading how you used our tool to help you decide whether or not to see the movie! I personally haven’t been out to catch it yet, but after reading this, it sounds like a can’t-miss film. Great analogy about how your analysis could translate into an evolving marketing strategy, too – thanks for sharing. Very cool use of the two services in tandem. Thanks for including us!

Best,
Elisabeth
Community Manager, uberVU

29-10-2012 11:35Paul F Cockburn

“I could read the newspaper reviews but the reviewers are inevitably influenced by the studio’s marketing department hype, which is designed to generate a giant miasma of belief, weeks before anyone has actually seen the film.”

OK; I may well be biased, being a journalist and everything, but I think you’re over-egging it with the “inevitably” there. Reading one or two reviews from reviewers you trust could have saved you hours of burrowing around in social media. It may strike you as old fashioned, but sod me it still actually works sometimes.

30-10-2012 08:45Chris West

hello Paul
thanks for your comment. But how does a reviewer live on this planet for the last 6 months and not be influenced by Skyfall’s hype? You either mock or singalong to Adele’s song. You can’t go the cinema (like a real person, paying for it) and not sit through an ad that somehow references Bond… then you have to have an opinion on what you’ve seen. It’s a lesson the Democrats took 10 years to learn in the States. To win, make sure you are the first person to define the topic of the conversation, and make sure you are big enough with it/controversial enough to demand a reply: then your opponents/doubters/reviewers inevitably have to engage in your premise, even to dismiss it. Even if I ask you not to think of an elephant, there’s inevitably a picture of an elephant in your mind. Right now.
Chris

    09-02-2013 04:34admin

    Looing to see if this threads correctly.

30-10-2012 10:42Paul F Cockburn

“How does a reviewer live on this planet for the last 6 months and not be influenced by Skyfall’s hype?” Well, how can YOU? How can anyone? (Especially if they’re regular cinema goers, or fans of the Bond films?) And what’s with this snide “real person” comment? Yes, a film reviewer is unlikely to pay for the price of admission, but that’s because they’re WORKING, and will have to produce a set number of words explaining their thoughts on the film, by a set deadline, for publication before the film is officially released. In that sense, they are a part of the film’s publicity, but it’s a part not controlled by the studio that made it or the cinema that’s showing it; any journalist worth their salt will be writing the kind of copy their editor wants to print for their particular readership.

Anyway; I should emphasise that I did find your original post very interesting (bar the pissing on professional journalists), especially your suggestions on how a film’s marketing team can use social media to more finely-tune their subsequent marketing campaign to keep the “buzz” about their film going. Do you think that’s something they’ll actually be doing? Or is it a case of they should be, but aren’t yet?

PS: Yes, you made me think of an elephant, but I rather doubt you were thinking of Dumbo. ;-)

PPS: Why does this blog system not recognise paragraph breaks? :-(

LEAVE A COMMENT

Opt out of 'Thank You' e-mails..

 
Find out more To email Chris, click here
Hear more